Additional Broadridge resources:
View our Contact Us page for additional information.
One of our sales representatives will email you about your submission.
Welcome back, {firstName lastName}.
Not {firstName}? Clear the form.
Want to speak with a sales representative?
Your sales rep submission has been received. One of our sales representatives will contact you soon.
Our representatives and specialists are ready with the solutions you need to advance your business.
Want to speak with a sales representative?
Table Heading | |
---|---|
+1 800 353 0103 | North America |
+442075513000 | EMEA |
+65 6438 1144 | APAC |
Your sales rep submission has been received. One of our sales representatives will contact you soon.
Want to speak with a sales representative?
Table Heading | |
---|---|
+1 800 353 0103 | North America |
+442075513000 | EMEA |
+65 6438 1144 | APAC |
Nos représentants et nos spécialistes sont prêts à vous apporter les solutions dont vous avez besoin pour faire progresser votre entreprise.
Vous voulez parler à un représentant commercial?
Table Heading | |
---|---|
+1 800 353 0103 | Amérique du Nord |
+1 905 470 2000 | Canada Markham |
+1 416 350 0999 | Canada Toronto |
Votre soumission a été reçue. Nous communiquerons avec vous sous peu.
Vous souhaitez parler à un commercial ?
Table Heading | |
---|---|
+1 800 353 0103 | Amérique du Nord |
+1 905 470 2000 | Canada Markham |
+1 416 350 0999 | Canada Toronto |
U.S. active fundamental equities attracted large inflows in the last twelve months, but overall net flows were negative as investors divested from traditional strategies. Within the defined contribution and not-for-profit channels, domestic and global/international destinations attracted inflows in excess of $70 billion. But redemptions from more traditional, plain-vanilla strategies resulted in total net outflows of more than $8 billion. Strategies that diversify across geographic regions and with an ex-U.S. focus captured solid inflows and net flows, especially in products with a growth focus. As Callan has advised its clients: “The case for active management varies greatly by market capitalization. Passive is typically appropriate for large-cap U.S equity. Active management is compelling for small/mid-cap, global ex-U.S. and non-U.S. small cap."